Risk Posture

Know Your Security Posture Before an Incident

Continuous, automated assessment of your MCP security configuration. A single score that proves your security investment is working — even without a single attack.

6
Security Categories
23
Automated Checks
5
Compliance Frameworks
Daily
Score Tracking

Security Score That Speaks to Executives

A single 0-100 score that non-technical stakeholders understand. No more translating security jargon into business language — the score tells the story on its own.

Historical trend tracking shows improvement over time, giving you the evidence you need to justify security investments and demonstrate progress to leadership.

"Your security posture improved from 65 to 82 this quarter" — the report that justifies your budget.

Excellent 90 — 100

Comprehensive security configuration. All critical checks pass.

Good 70 — 89

Solid foundation in place. Some areas need attention.

Needs Attention 50 — 69

Significant gaps in security coverage. Prioritize recommendations.

Critical 0 — 49

Immediate action required. Core security controls are missing.

Six Categories, Zero Blind Spots

Your security score is composed of six weighted categories that cover every aspect of MCP infrastructure security. Each category contributes a defined number of points to the overall 100-point scale.

Access Control

20 points

Server alias coverage, rate limits, tool visibility, agent registration, and autonomy levels. Ensures only authorized agents access the right tools.

Threat Detection

20 points

Multi-layered threat detection, response-side scanning, tool inspection, and first-use verification. Covers the full spectrum of MCP-specific threats.

Data Protection

20 points

Data loss prevention, PII masking, trust boundary rules, and enforcement. Prevents sensitive data from leaking through agent interactions.

Policy Enforcement

15 points

Active policies, deny rules, conditions, and high-risk tool coverage. Validates that your policy configuration matches your security requirements.

Monitoring & Audit

15 points

Audit logging, session correlation, server health, and SIEM integration. Ensures you have full observability into every MCP interaction.

Incident Readiness

10 points

Notification channels, threat feedback loop, and compliance tracking. Measures how prepared you are to detect and respond to security incidents.

Compliance Mapping — Not a Checkbox Exercise

Every check maps to real compliance requirements. When a check fails, you see exactly which regulations and controls are affected — not abstract guidance, but specific articles and criteria.

When your check "Rate limits configured" fails, you see exactly which EU AI Act article and SOC 2 control are affected. This turns compliance from a periodic audit exercise into a continuous, measurable process.

Frameworks Covered

EU AI Act — Articles 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 62
NIST AI RMF 1.0 — Govern, Measure, Manage functions
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — AI Management System
SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria — CC6, CC7
OWASP LLM Top 10 2025

Example: Failed Check Impact

Rate limits not configured

No rate limits are set for registered agents. Agents can make unlimited tool calls.

EU AI Act Art. 15 Accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity
SOC 2 CC6.1 Logical and physical access controls
NIST AI RMF Manage 2.2 — Mechanisms for risk mitigation
PII masking enabled

PII detection and masking active for all agent responses.

EU AI Act Art. 10 Data governance
ISO 42001 A.10 Data for AI systems

Actionable Recommendations

Not just "you have a problem" — but "here's exactly how to fix it." Every failed check generates a specific, severity-ranked recommendation with a direct link to the settings page.

High Severity

Critical security gaps that leave your infrastructure exposed. These checks directly affect your ability to prevent and detect attacks.

Example: "Enable prompt injection detection — all agent requests are currently unchecked."

Medium Severity

Important hardening steps that strengthen your security posture. Addressing these reduces your attack surface and improves compliance coverage.

Example: "Add deny rules for high-risk tools — 3 destructive tools have no policy coverage."

Low Severity

Best-practice recommendations for comprehensive coverage. These optimizations enhance your security maturity and reporting capabilities.

Example: "Enable SIEM integration — audit logs are stored locally but not forwarded."

Every recommendation includes a direct link to fix — one click to the settings page.

Stop Guessing Your Security Posture

Get continuous, automated security assessment for your MCP infrastructure.

Join the Waitlist